Does monetary union reduce employment?

Posted on Thursday, November 18, 2010

We use a two-country monetary model with unionized labor markets and open-economy spillovers to study the macroeconomic consequences of the formation of a monetary union. It is shown that the monetary regime affects the trade-off between real consumer wages and employment faced by the unions. Consequently, the equilibrium employment is endogenous and depends on the monetary regime. In particular, a switch from a floating exchange rate regime to a monetary union improves employment, provided that the degree of central bank conservatism is sufficiently high, whereas with low degrees of conservatism employment falls. Inflation is higher in a monetary union with all finite degrees of central bank conservatism. In addition, we consider an asymmetric fixed exchange rate regime as an alternative starting position for a monetary union. All results are derived assuming that labor unions are only interested in employment and real wages (not directly inflation) and that all structural parameters of the model remain unchanged when a monetary union is established.

Introduction: This paper investigates the effect of the formatiobn of the monetary union on employment and inflation. A large literature of monetary policy games initiated by the seminal contributions of Kydland and prescott (1977) shows that under a wide range of assumptions monetary policy is neutral in the long run and the equilibrium rate of rate of employment is determined only by real factors of the economy.

Author: Anssi Rantala

Source: Research Discussion Papers, Bank of Finland

Download URL 2: Visit Now

More Interesting Content

Does monetary union reduce employment?